Take a sneak peek at the new NIST.gov and let us know what you think!
(Please note: some content may not be complete on the beta site.).
Are You Lighting Fires or Getting Burned?The 2011–2012 Criteria for Performance Excellence have just been released. One new concept introduced is “intelligent risk.” While it is mentioned only in item notes and item descriptions, I believe it is an important concept for all leaders and all organizations to consider as a key factor in organizational sustainability. It is essential in achieving innovation. As a matter of fact, in a study of innovative organizations conducted 20 years ago, Charles Hampden Turner reported (Charting the Corporate Mind, New York: The Free Press, 1990, p. 17) that managers identified two critical elements for innovation: (1) support for risk taking and change and (2) tolerance of mistakes.
The lesson from this study and others is that discouraging risk taking and potentially rewarding risk avoidance (an unconscious practice of many organizations) also discourages and hampers innovation and progress. Properly encouraged, risk is thus a source of opportunity and sustainability—not, as many think, a source strictly of potential danger. Hence, the concept of intelligent risk becomes important to organizational sustainability and to an organization’s senior leadership as a sustainability factor.
A good operational definition of an intelligent risk might be “an opportunity where the potential gain outweighs the harm or loss that could impact the organization’s sustainability if the opportunity is not explored.” Inherent in the concept is a strategic decision on resources to commit and also knowing if the risk has reached a point in exploration where more resources should be committed or resources should be pulled because results indicate that the harm may now be greater than the benefit. Of course, the organization can never reach this point if it is so averse to risks that it never makes the initial commitment.
This brings me to my title for this post and “lighting fires”! A simple analogy for intelligent risk is how one considers fire. If individuals avoid fire completely (being risk-averse), they will have a cold home, cold showers, and lots of cold food. If they use fire effectively (taking an intelligent risk), it will make their lives better and more comfortable. If they use fire recklessly and in an uncontrolled fashion (taking an unintelligent risk or being a daredevil), they will get burned and lose their assets. Can you find your organization’s position on the “fire scale”?
Hopefully, this discussion has convinced readers that intelligent risk is a key to value creation. But where does intelligent risk end and organizational daredevil behavior begin? How much risk is it intelligent for an organization to take? Are you prepared to take intelligent risks? I believe the answers to these questions depend on numerous factors. Here are some of the factors I would consider:
I am sure my list is not exhaustive. I will give people an opportunity to share their thoughts in an upcoming Blogrige entry. Please give the topic some thought and contribute to a dialogue.
Let me conclude this month’s column by promoting an intelligent risk I believe all organizations should take (actually, there is no risk involved). That is, become active in your state or local Baldrige-based program or the Baldrige Program by having someone in your organization serve as an examiner, and bring that knowledge back to your strategic planning process. The online application for becoming a Baldrige examiner is now open.
Dr. Harry Hertz, Director