NIST scientists are developing a highly accurate primary standard for pressure in the range 2 MPa to 7 MPa based on fundamental physical properties of helium. With this new standard, we will improve our understanding of piston-cylinder sets used as working pressure standards and we will reduce the uncertainty of their pressure-dependent effective areas.
Atomic physicists have calculated the pressure p(n,T) of helium gas as a function of the gas’s temperature T and its refractive index at microwave frequencies, n. Near room temperature and 4 MPa, the fractional uncertainties from the calculations, the impurities in helium, state-of-art measurements of the temperature, refractive index, and the deformation of the apparatus under pressure are approximately 6.2 parts per million. The combination of these uncertainties is smaller than the uncertainties of existing pressure standards (piston gages) near 4 MPa. Therefore, the refractive index of helium can become an atomic standard of pressure to calibrate piston-cylinder sets. Calibrations will become easier after we compare the index of refraction of helium nHe(p,T) to the index of refraction of argon nAr(p,T) with uncertainties equivalent to 1×10−6 p. After the helium-argon comparison, argon will be a secondary atomic standard of pressure. An argon standard will have 1/8th the sensitivity to deformation of the apparatus and 1/8th the sensitivity to water impurities because [nAr(p,T) − 1]/[nHe(p,T) − 1] ≈ 8.
Above 300 kPa, NIST’s pressure standards are commercially manufactured piston-cylinder sets. In operation, both the piston and the cylinder deform significantly with pressure and the piston rotates continuously to insure gas lubrication. Because of these complications, piston-cylinder sets are calibrated using NIST’s primary-standard mercury manometer below 300 kPa and the calibration is extrapolated to higher pressures using numerical models of the coupled gas flow and elastic distortions. The data used for extrapolation exhibit poorly understood dependencies on the gas used and its flow rate; therefore, the extrapolation is not fully trusted. The extrapolation cannot be checked with existing technologies; however, the atomic standard of pressure will reduce extrapolation uncertainties.
For more information, contact James Schmidt.