Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Sub-micrometer Particle Standards for Quantitative Flow Cytometry

Interlaboratory Comparison of Number Concentration Measurements

The number concentrations of both unstained and fluorescently-labeled polystyrene sub-micrometer sphere suspensions with nominal diameters from 100 nm to 500 nm have been measured using seven different techniques.  Number concentration values that agree within the known uncertainties of the instruments are considered high accuracy—typically within 10% of each other.  Only three of the techniques were able to achieve this level of agreement.  A consensus-based protocol using these three high-accuracy, validated techniques has been developed at NIST to certify sub-micrometer particle suspensions for number concentration.

Consensus techniques used for certification of number concentration:

  • Dry mass with transmission electron microscopy (DM)
  • Flow cytometery (FCM)
  • Fluorescence microscopy with charged slide (FM)

Instrument Calibration using Certified Reference Beads

The value-assigned suspensions described above are inteded for use as new reference materials for the calibration of instruments capable of sub-micrometer particle number concentration measurements.  NIST has demonstrated the use of such reference beads for number concentration calibration of flow cytometers (see below) and for other techniques, including particle tracking analysis (PTA), microfluidic resistive pulse sensing (MRPS), and asymmetric flow field fractionation with multi-angle light scattering (AF4-MALS).

Two dot plots from an imaging flow cytometer showing how the appearance of 100 nm beads, left, can be used to calibrate the size range for extracellular vesicles, right.
Left, the intensity from a 100 nm bead sample can clearly be distinguished and, right, used to set an appropriate gate for similarly sized extracellular vesicles (EVs) while excluding aggregates.

ERF Fluorescence Intensity Assignment of Calibration Beads

NIST assigns equivalent reference fluorophores (ERF) units to the fluorescence intensity of a calibration bead by using a reference fluorophore solution as a standard light bulb.  The integrated intensity of the emission spectrum of a reference fluorophore solution is compared to the integrated intensity of the emission spectrum of a bead solution.  The fluorophore concentration of the reference fluorophore is known, allowing fluorescence intensity to be quantified in terms of fluorophore concentration, i.e., ERF units.

Two panels showing concepts of NIST equivalent reference fluorophores value assignment.  Top, the fluorescence emission spectrum of a reference solution is recorded and compared to, bottom, the emission spectrum of a suspension of calibration beads with known number concentration.
NIST equivalent reference fluorophores (ERF) value assignment.  Top, the emission spectrum for a reference fluorophore solution of known concentration is measured and integrated intensity is compared with that from the emission spectrum of a suspension of calibration beads dyed with the same fluorophore and having a well-characterized number concentration.

The number concentration of the bead suspension is determined using the consensus technique values as explained above.  The fluorescence intensity and number concentration values of the bead suspension are then used to calculate the mean fluorescence intensity of a calibration bead in ERF units.  These ERF value-assigned beads can be used to calibrate the fluorescence intensity scale of flow cytometers.  NIST has assigned ERF values for commercially available sub-micrometer calibration beads with nominal diameters of 100 nm, 200 nm, and 500  nm.

Disclaimer:  Certain commercial materials are identified to specify experimental results as completely as possible.  In no case does the identification of specific manufacturers, brands, or materials imply a recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the materials are necessarily the best available for the purpose.

Return to the Quantitative Flow Cytometry Measurements Program page.

Created February 9, 2025, Updated April 15, 2025