Skip to main content

NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.

Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Polarized-Low-Energy-Electron-Diffraction Study of the Mechanism of Electron Reflection from W(001) at Low Energies

Published

Author(s)

E McRae, Daniel T. Pierce, G Wang, Robert Celotta

Abstract

Polarized-low-energy-electron-diffraction (PLEED) measurements on W(001) are reported for incidence conditions close to the (01) beam threshold [energies 2<E<9 eV, polar angles 15°<θ <45°, (01) azimuth]. The intensity structure I(E) on the low-energy side of the threshold is found to depend on the spin polarization of the incident electrons. For θ >25¿, corresponding peaks in Iuarr} (E) and Idarr} (E) are split in proportion to their width [symbols [uarr} (darr}) designate spin up (down) with respect to the scattering plane]. For θ <25° the splitting-to-width ratio increases, and a shoulder grows up on the low-energy side of the lowest-energy peak of Iuarr}(E). The observations are explained by the superposition of reflection-amplitude contributions from "direct" or single scattering at the substrate and "indirect" processes in which the (01) beam is multiply reflected between the substrate and the surface-potential barrier. For θ >25° the differences between Iuarr}(E) and Idarr}(E) derive from the spin dependence of the phase of superposition of direct and indirect amplitude terms. The main effects come from the first indirect term, which corresponds to a single reflection at the surface potential barrier. For θ <25° there are additional important contributions from higher-order indirect terms. These terms add coherently to produce a resonance perturbation of the line shape of Iuarr} (E). The present results, taken together with earlier LEED results, indicate that the threshold interference mechanism is the dominant mechanism of very low-energy (<10 eV) electron reflection at the W(001) surface.
Citation
Physical Review B (Condensed Matter and Materials Physics)
Volume
24

Citation

McRae, E. , Pierce, D. , Wang, G. and Celotta, R. (1981), Polarized-Low-Energy-Electron-Diffraction Study of the Mechanism of Electron Reflection from W(001) at Low Energies, Physical Review B (Condensed Matter and Materials Physics) (Accessed October 15, 2025)

Issues

If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact [email protected].

Created October 14, 1981, Updated October 12, 2021
Was this page helpful?