Computer Grammars for the Syntactical Analysis of Paintings

Published

January 1, 1989

Author(s)

Russell A. Kirsch, J Kirsch

Abstract

How do we, as informed viewers, recognize an example of an artist?s work, a piece we have never seen before? We probably carry in our collection of visual memories, usually in some inarticulate fashion, a knowledge of formal regularities that an artist typically displays in his work. It is the syntactic nature of the work that we notice: the quality of lines, colors, shapes and their arrangements. We recognize paintings by what we see, not by what they mean. For example, we are little inclined to recognize a face by Modigliani or Soutine because one is serene and one is tortured (semantic qualities), but rather because each has a noticeably different technique for drawing and painting. Moreover, the way an artist treats a range of plastic opportunities, albeit handmaidens of meaning, will be his most enduring personal stamp. It is these plastic (syntactic) qualities, which can be expressed as a grammar, that we will address and explain in this paper.

Citation

World Art: Themes of Unity in Diversity

Pub Type

Journals

Download Paper

Local Download

Keywords

computer grammars, paintings, syntactical analysis

Citation

Kirsch, R. and Kirsch, J. (1989), Computer Grammars for the Syntactical Analysis of Paintings, World Art: Themes of Unity in Diversity, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=821719 (Accessed November 8, 2024)