Duewer, D.
, Gasca-Aragon, H.
, Lippa, K.
and Toman, B.
(2012),
Comparison of value-assigned CRMs and PT materials: experimental design and data evaluation, BIPM, [online], www.bipm.org
(Accessed January 29, 2025)
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Comparison of value-assigned CRMs and PT materials: experimental design and data evaluation
Published
Author(s)
, , ,
Abstract
This document provides the tedious mathematical details for OAWG Track B Key Comparisons that is, this document presents and discusses the statistical approaches involved in the design of Track B studies and analysis of the resulting data. This document is not required reading for an adequate appreciation of the conclusions drawn from the CCQM K79 Comparison of value-assigned CRMs and PT materials: ethanol in aqueous matrix and CCQM K80 Comparison of value-assigned CRMs and PT materials: creatinine in human serum studies. This document is a necessary adjunct to the CCQM K79 and/or K80 reports for anyone seeking to understand and/or critique the design and analysis of these studies and it is recommended reading for anyone who wishes to propose or coordinate another OAWG Track B study.Citation
BIPM
Pub Type
Websites
Keywords
CCQM (Consultative Committee on the Quantity of Matter Chemistry), CRM (Certified Reference Material), GDR (Generalized Distance Regression), KC (Key Comparison), KCRF (Key Comparison Reference Function), OAWG (Organic Analysis Working Group)
Citation
Issues
If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact reflib@nist.gov.
Created August 21, 2012, Updated September 28, 2020