Photomask Dimensional Metrology in the SEM Part I: Has Anything Really Changed?

Published

January 1, 2003

Author(s)

Michael T. Postek, Andras Vladar, Marylyn H. Bennett

Abstract

Photomask dimensional metrology in the scanning electron microscope (SEM) has not evolved as rapidly as the metrology of resists and integrated circuit features on wafers. This has been due partly to the 4x (or 5x) reduction in the optical steppers and scanners used in the lithography process, and partly for the lesser need to account for the real three- dimensionality of the mask structures. So, where photomasks are concerned, many of the issues challenging wafer dimensional metrology at 1x are reduced by a factor of 4 or 5 and thus could be temporarily swept aside. This is rapidly changing with the introduction of advanced masks with optical proximity correction and phase shifting features used in 100 nm and smaller circuit generations. Fortunately, photomask metrology generally benefits from the advances made for wafer metrology, but there are still unique issues to be solved in this form of dimensional metrology. It is likely that no single metrology method or tool will ever provide all necessary answers. As with other types of metrology, resolution, sensitivity and linearity in the three dimensional measurements of the shape of the lines and phase shifting features in general (width, height and wall angles) and the departures from the desired shape (surface and edge roughness, etc.) are the key parameters. Different methods and tools differ in their ability to collect averaged and localized signals with an acceptable speed, but in any case, application of through knowledge of the physics of the given metrology is essential to extract the needed information. This paper will discuss the topics of precision, accuracy and traceability in the SEM metrology of photomasks. Current and possible new techniques utilized in the measurements of photomasks including charge suppression and highly accurate modeling for electron beam metrology will also be explored to answer the question Has any thing really changed?

Citation

Journal of Microlithography Microfabrication and Microsystems

Volume

3

Issue

2

Pub Type

Journals

Keywords

charging, critical dimension, critical dimension, metrology, metrology, photomask, photomask charging, scanning electron microscope, SEM

Citation

Postek, M. , Vladar, A. and Bennett, M. (2003), Photomask Dimensional Metrology in the SEM Part I: Has Anything Really Changed?, Journal of Microlithography Microfabrication and Microsystems (Accessed December 26, 2024)