Metrication Case Studies

Caterpillar Tractor Company commenced its metrication efforts in 1971 after the Congress-commissioned study A Metric America: A Decision Whose Time Has Come was published. Caterpillar began its conversion because of its operations in metric countries. Caterpillar’s number of sheet steel sizes were reduced from 74 sizes to 34 metric sizes. Additionally, its metal bar sizes were reduced from more than 500 to fewer than 200. These adjustments yielded a 54 % decrease in metal costs. Utilizing one standardized measurement system benefited Caterpillar $900,000 to $1,000,000 annually because of inventory reductions and the decrease in the cost of parts internationally. Compared to the achieved benefits, Caterpillar’s cost of metrication was minimal.

General Motors began its metrication efforts in 1973. These metrication efforts significantly reduced the quantity of sized parts required. One provided example includes fan belts, which had its sizes reduced from more than 900 to fewer than 100. Additionally, switching to standardized wire gauges reduced the number of wire sizes used; this improvement in wire efficiency reduced costs by $1,600,000 each year. This single fiscal benefit surpassed General Motor’s annual metrication costs.

These case studies display potential cost savings, inventory reductions, and efficiency increases from switching to the metric system. In many case studies, any costs of metrication were quickly recovered, as portrayed in Caterpillar Tractor Company and General Motors. Furthermore, metrication is essential to efficient operation in international economies.

A survey of small businesses was administered by the U.S. Metric Board in 1980. The report noted that industry action and customer demand dominate as reasons for converting.

Between 1981 and 1982, the U.S. Metric Board commissioned a two-part investigation into the consequences of small businesses after metrication. The first phase identified small businesses that had made substantial investments in converting to metric. Research demonstrated that small businesses typically invest in metric production in response to a large corporation’s needs for metric parts and products. The second phase reported three case studies evaluating the effects of large businesses metrication on small business suppliers. The team studied how the conversion of a General Electric Company department, two Ford Motor Company product lines, and three divisions of Ingersoll-Rand affected their small business suppliers.

• Metric Usage Study: A Look at Six Case Histories, U.S. Metric Board (1982). This report describes metrication experiences of U.S. firms encapsulated in 6 case histories.
  • Black and Webster
  • Samuel Cabot, Inc.
  • Caterpillar Tractor
  • National Distillers Company
  • Levi Strauss & Co.
  • Inland Steel Company
• Metrication in Perspective (1975), Chapter 9, Case Studies. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International.
  • Ford and Metric Engine.
  • IBM and Metrication.
  • The Livermore Plan of Metrication.
• Metrication - Managing Industrial Transition: A symposium presented at the Seventy-seventh Annual Meeting and sponsored by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International. Standing Committee on Publications (1975). R.G. Liptai and J.W. Pearson, editors.
  • Case History, Honeywell Inc.
  • Metrication Experience at Caterpillar Tractor Co.
  • Metric Conversion at General Motors.
  • A Metrication Case History: Ford’s 2.3 Litre Engine. The report describes Ford's experience in engineering and manufacturing the first mass-produced, metric automotive engine in the United States, conversion process issues, and techniques to minimize metrication costs.
  • Metrication – How One Small Company Did It. The report describes the metrication approach taken by Morgan Construction Company, Worcester, MA (acquired by Siemens Corp, 2008), including the establishment of a metrication task group.

• Applied Concepts Corporation. A Study of Metric Conversion of Distilled Spirits Containers: A Policy and Planning Evaluation. Task I. Comprehensive Report on the Conversion Process. (1981, August). U.S. Metric Board.
• Applied Concepts Corporation. A Study of Metric Conversion of Distilled Spirits Containers: A Policy and Planning Evaluation. Final Report on Findings and Lessons Learned. (1981, October). U.S. Metric Board.
• Applied Concepts Corporation. Survey of Consumer Attitudes and Awareness of the Metric Conversion of Distilled Spirits Containers. A Special Report for: A Study of Metric Conversion of Distilled Spirits Containers: A Policy and Planning Evaluation. (1981, December). U.S. Metric Board.
• Wine and spirits may only be sold in those approved standard sizes approved by the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB), a division of the U.S. Department of Treasury.
• Current Regulations. Title 27, Chapter I, Subchapter A (Code of Federal Regulations, National Archives)
  • Part 4 – Labeling and Advertising of Wine
  • Part 5 – Labeling and Advertising of Distilled Spirits
  • Part 7 – Labeling and Advertising of Malt Beverages
• Explore additional consumer packaging and labeling resources.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama, contracted a study to analyze approaches for implementing metric system operations for a Large Space Telescope. The evaluation considered three possible approaches: no metrication, soft, and hard processes. The report (1973) addresses data handling, unit conversion, dual measures, standard metric-sized materials, and aerospace metrication efforts. The use of machinery conversion groupings and “thinking metric” is emphasized. Investigators note a previous study, which stated that operations would not be negatively impacted by metrication. System cost during the transition were approximated.

From 1978 to 1983, the Western Snow Conference (WSC) conducted a Metrication Study. The Metrication of Manual Snow Sampling Equipment – Final Report (1983) describes the WSC metrication process activities, design recommendations, specifications, and drawings as well as a proposal for converting to metric snow sampling equipment. The University of Nevada maintains original research documentation in its collection, which is accessible by researchers onsite.

This 1982 study commissioned by the U.S. Metric Board assesses the potential safety issues of workplace metric conversion. Thirty-five occupations were sampled and analyzed to identify potential safety hazards by industrial hygienists, safety engineers and academia. Investigators reported that a well-planned metrication program reduces hazard potential.

The U.S. has long promoted SI adoption, and radiation organizations have recommended exclusive SI use for over 30 years. Yet, conventional units persist in U.S. radiation measurements, requiring professionals to understand and convert between both systems. In 2017, an ad hoc National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine committee conducted a workshop in Washington, DC to obtain perspectives from United States radiation protection and user communities on the potential communication improvements associated with adopting the SI for radiation measurement units. The Workshop Proceedings reported a summary of presentations and discussions that focused on improving national and international radiation emergency response, current national radiation unit practices (mixed use of both SI and non-SI units), benefits and challenges of exclusive SI radiation unit use, international SI radiation unit adoption lessons learned, and possible next steps towards exclusive U.S. use of SI radiation units. Some workshop participants noted that SI radiation unit adoption in the U.S. has been slow and that a lack of SI usage regulatory requirements for the nuclear power industry had subsequently inhibited SI adoption by local, state, and federal government agencies. Participants recognized that a coordinated interagency effort is needed to further examine costs and benefits, as well as plan for exclusive SI measurement unit implementation.

Research conducted under this contract was designed to provide insight into the metrication status within two U.S. industry sectors: Construction and Electronics. Degree of metrication, near and long term prospects, export potential, and food chain participants, related opportunities and challenges were analyzed in NIST Grant/Contractor Report (GCR) 96-686, Study to Identify Industries Positioned for Significant Impact on U.S. Metrication (May 1995).

Supply chain networks were described within the report. The electronics supply chain included the design of electronic components, includes fabrication and engineering of components, design and fabrication of boards and card cages within the original equipment manufactures equipment into which they are integrated. Facility managers, maintenance personnel and highway repair crews were noted as the largest rung of the construction supply chain. Specific strategies aimed at accelerating Construction and Electronics industry metrication (Appendix A) may be used by organizations and agencies as an aid in developing their own strategies.

The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) reported an analysis of SI use in documentary standards. The ASTM Standardization News editor, notes in Of SI and Standards that when work began in 2008, 66 % of documentary standards followed the rules found in Form and Style for ASTM Standards, which increased to 85 % by 2014. A great deal of progress has been made in ensuring that ASTM committees use SI units, non-SI units, or both, appropriately. “This effort has revealed that about 17 percent of standards, such as most terminology standards, do not use units. Of the standards that do use units, a majority, about 51 percent, use SI only; 33 percent use non-SI units; and 16 percent use both units combined.”

• U.S. Metrication
• Metrication Best Practices
• Metrication Costs and Benefits
• Errors and Mishaps
• Metrication in Law
• Education Metrication
• Metrication Training
• Metrication Resources for Researchers