The Firearms & Toolmarks Subcommittee focuses on standards and guidelines related to the examination of firearm and toolmark evidence. This includes the comparison of microscopic toolmarks on bullets, cartridge cases, and other ammunition components and may also include firearm function testing, serial number restoration, muzzle-to-object distance determination, tools, and toolmarks.
Officers | Members | Standards | Other Work Products
Todd Weller, Subcommittee Chair, Weller Forensics, LLC
Erica Lawton, Subcommittee Vice Chair, Alabama Department of Forensic Sciences; University of South Alabama
Justine Kreso, Subcommittee Executive Secretary, Onondaga County Center for Forensic Sciences
Michael Beddow, Phoenix Police Department Crime Laboratory
Zachary Carr, Johnson County Sheriff's Office Criminalistics Laboratory
James Carroll, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Crime Laboratory
Bridget Chambers, Hamilton County Coroner & Crime Laboratory
Eric Collins, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives
Kyle Felix, United States Army Criminal Investigation Laboratory
Stefanie Happ, El Paso County Sheriff's Office
Stacey Hartman, Indiana State Police
Ryan Lilien, Cadre Research Labs
Max Morris, Iowa State University (Statistics Task Group representative)
Rebecca Mullen, Arkansas State Crime Laboratory (Quality Task Group representative)
Aimee Qulia, Federal Bureau of Investigation
Kevin Rippman, Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, Tobacco and Explosives
Maneka Sinha, University of Maryland, School of Law (Legal Task Group representative)
Johannes Soons, National Institute of Standards and Technology
Michael Stocker, National Institute of Standards and Technology
Raymond Valerio, Queens District Attorney's Office (Legal Task Group representative)
Eric Warren, SEP Forensic Consultants
Alan Zheng, National Institute of Standards and Technology
Firearms & Toolmarks Affiliate List
All proposed standards listed below are completed work products of the OSAC Firearms & Toolmarks Subcommittee and have passed a rigorous technical and quality review by the subcommittee. The subcommittee encourages the forensic science community to implement these proposed standards. These proposed standards were developed by the Subcommittee, prior to October 1, 2020, when the OSAC Proposed Standards for the OSAC Registry approval procedures went into effect.
Note: Subcommittee position statements or responses to data collections by the subcommittee do not necessarily represent the position of OSAC or NIST.
These documents may contain information to help forensic scientists, judges, lawyers, researchers, and other readers better understand the nature, scope, and foundations of the individual disciplines as currently practiced. The identification of these documents does not represent an endorsement by OSAC or NIST. Only standards that are posted on the OSAC Registry and Technical Guidance documents, are endorsed by OSAC. The referenced documents may be subject to copyright. Note: Subcommittee position statements or responses to data collections by the subcommittee do not necessarily represent the position of OSAC or NIST.